Although TTRPGs are a relatively young cultural form, there is a huge body of discourse on them—huge to the point of seeming overwhelming. This post is meant to ease some of that anxiety by aggregating and annotating important contributions to the critical discussion surrounding TTRPGs. Its two primary goals are to promote better understandings of:
- critical vocabulary and conceptual frameworks
- the history of RPGs and RPG theory
This roster isn’t comprehensive—and won’t ever be—but it will be updated as I’m able to review additional resources.
Updated 22 February 2021
Magne Gåsland, What did Wittgenstein Say About What ‘A Game’ Is? Contains excerpts and some quotations from secondary sources, all of which convey Wittgenstein’s notion of games. Though his primary argument concerns language, Wittgenstein uses games as an analogy, arguing that even though we may not be able to comprehensively define games, we recognize them through their shared characteristics.
Johan Huizinga, Homo Ludens. Lays out the primary characteristics of play that Wittgenstein gestures toward. Huizinga also sketches a binary typology of abstract play. His overall argument is that civilization arises from the human instinct toward play. I’ve previously written about Huizinga’s theory and its relation to TTRPGs.
Roger Caillois, Man, Play and Games. Elaborates on Huizinga’s themes, including the characteristics of games and play, the continuum between the two, the major types of play, and how game dynamics inform our social interactions. I’ve also written a short reference sheet that sketches the major points.
Greg Costikyan, I Have No Words & I Must Design. Recasts ideas from Huizinga and Callois for TTRPG design. Very readable and relevant in presentation, if not particularly original in content.
Theories of Games
Richard D. Duke. Gaming: The Future’s Language. Duke presents gaming as a complex form of communication that enable participants to explore and understand large-scale systems more effectively and efficiently than is possible through other, less sophisticated modes of communication. The book also includes astute frameworks for developing, testing, and evaluating games. Published in 1974—the same year Gygax and Arneson formally released Dungeons & Dragons—the book makes no mention of TTRPGs but is fundamentally applicable to them. (Points about accessibility of digital technology and means of distribution are, however, self-evidently dated.)
James P. Carse. Finite and Infinite Games. Recasts all forms of human activity as two types of play. The argument is framed dialectically and presented aphoristically, leaving virtually no corner of society and culture unexamined. An expansive, sometimes abstract, and perspective-altering mode of examining human nature.
William Poundstone. Prisoner’s Dilemma. Part biography, part history, part theoretical exposition. An accessible introduction to the pinnacles and pitfalls of rational decision-making in two-player games. Not directly related to RPGs, but still relevant to theoretical concerns.
Amagi Games, The Manyfold Glossary. A roster of terms and concepts useful for players, designers, and critics/theorists.
S. John Ross. An RPG Lexicon. A specialized, useful conceptual vocabulary for thinking about play and game design in terms of tactics, problem solving, and characterization. Links to more in-depth discussions of topics and terms.
History of TTRPGs
Latitude Team. Role-Playing Games in the Renaissance Court. Summarizes pre-modern games with RPG elements like mechanical randomization, adopting fictional characters, collaborative storytelling, and using fictional worlds as a tool for problem-solving. Links to sources for further reading. A useful starting point for exploring the original Old-School Renaissance.
Jon Peterson. The Elusive Shift. An in-depth, very readable history of early TTRPG culture and the concurrent emergence of RPG theory. Peterson begins by examining the opposing schools of mid-century wargaming (playability vs. realism, “free” wargaming vs. strictly rules-adjudicated play) and the emergence of distinct characters in wargaming, then the discussion moves on to the fundamental ambiguity and incompleteness of D&D as a basis for early RPG adopters (SFF fandom and wargamers) to explore different goals and desires. Concludes with discussions of AD&D’s attempt to force closure via a comprehensive system and Blacow’s model of player types as the first sophisticated theorization of the genre. In addition to being an interesting history lesson, Peterson’s work exposes how ongoing theoretical and practical debates have been, all along, the fundamental bedrock of RPGs.
Steven Darlington, A History of Roleplaying. A nine-part series that delivers a surprising amount of detail while remaining engaging and readable. Covers important games as well as the history of the industry and cultural reactions to RPGs.
Jon H. Kim, A Brief History of Fashion in RPG Design. Describes the history of RPGs, 1974 – 2000s, as a series of discrete, coherent movements that dominate certain periods.
Lowell Francis, Age of Ravens. Multi-part histories of RPGs by genre. I’ve not read it, but it strikes me as intelligent and fairly detailed.
Shannon Appelcline, Designers & Dragons. A four-volume series exploring RPG history decade by decade. I haven’t read this either, but I’ve seen it praised.
Glen Blacow, Aspects of Adventure Gaming. Divides players into four fundamental types. This is a foundational text that informs the major trends of RPG theory that followed.
Robin D. Laws, Player Types. Refines Blacow’s quartet into a more granular hextet.
Hunter Logan, Player Goals. Further expands player types to 15 categories and includes a discussion of relevant design considerations.
The Threefold Model
John H. Kim, The Origin of the Threefold Model. Describes the tumultuous birth and development of RPG theory discussions online. In this phase, RPG theory is concerned with how players make in-game decisions. The model posits stances based on competition, storytelling, and exploration.
John H. Kim, The Threefold Model FAQ. A primary document summarizing the main characteristics of this early model. Revised, but contains links to original versions.
Ron Edwards, System Does Matter. Discusses the role mechanics play in the gaming experience. Recasts the basics of the Threefold Model and introduces discussion of modes of resolution, including how the weight of the rules affects gameplay. This is the starting point for Edwards’s work on the GNS model.
Ron Edwards, GNS and Other Matters of Role-playing Theory. A relatively elaborate and wide-ranging model of RPG design and function oriented on player goals. Intended as something of a design bible, the model has some usefulness for analysis but is (in my opinion) too abstract to be effective as a direct, practical resource for creators.
Ron Edwards, The Big Model (secondary source). An attempt to bring GNS’s insights into a more unified practical model. Again, I feel its focus on creating a panoptic perspective inhibits its usefulness as a design framework, and the theory’s alleged unity feels like an arbitrary bricolage.
John H. Kim, The 3D Model of Role-Playing. A summary of the 3D model that refines GNS into 9 granular categories oriented on the focus of play and the centralization of authority. Includes a discussion of how the two theories interact and overlap.
Scarlet Jester, All You Need to Know About GEN. A Marxist-inspired model of how infrastructural techniques support superstructural player desires.
The Israeli School
Haggai Elkayam Shalem. Your Character Does Not Exist. Argues that characters are an inaccessible pretense for play and that gaming is better understood as interaction and communication amongst players.
Michael Gorodin. Everyone Is a GM. Reconsiders authority in terms of cues that affect other players’ behaviors and attitudes. The implication is that game running is less hierarchical, more collaborative and interactive than is typically recognized. References and links to other related sources.
Gil Ran. Your Game Doesn’t Have a Story. Examines conceptions of a game’s narrative and argues that “story” is a matter of establishing and satisfying expectations rather than premeditated plotting or a continuous, coherent, recognizable form that play adheres to in real time.
Other Theoretical Discussions
Steven Darlington, Defining Our Terms. A very readable discussion of the conflicted relationship between rules-based gaming and storytelling, which presents a perennial problem for considerations of narrative experiences.
Greg Porter, Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going. A taxonomy of RPGs based around the binary opposition between mechanics and lore (system and setting, fluff and crunch, etc.)
Roles, Rules & Rolls. Analog, Digital, Procedural. A discussion of three types of information in gaming: analog details, digital stats, and procedural instructions. A much-needed alternative to the fluff-crunch dichotomy that constitutes Porter’s centerpiece.
Brian Gleichman, Elements of Gaming. A very valuable, design-focused discussion of TTRPGs. A wide-ranging study of many that examines complexity, tactics, strategy, mechanics rationales, and levels of player experience without sacrificing valuable theoretical and practical insight.
S. John Ross. Porn Logic. Addresses mechanics’ role in dictating play behavior on both sides of the screen. Contrasts this style with the organic, creative activity of roleplaying and discusses the types of tactics appropriate to each.
Emily Care Boss, Theory Roundup. A resource-packed narrative of RPG history, RPG theory, and the history of RPG theory through 2014.
John H. Kim, Evolution of the Threefold Model. Summarizes the origin and thesis of the Threefold Model, then overviews the theories that emerged from that foundation.
Brian Gleichman, Timeline of RPG Theory. A compendium similar to Kim’s various essays, but includes extended contextual consideration of preceding theories.
RPGs as Art
Robin D. Laws, The Hidden Art. A seminal text in which Laws explains the need for (and problems with) a critical discourse on RPGs.
Robert Sullivan, Role-Playing Games as Art. An argument for considering RPGs as an artform that amalgamates literary, graphic, and performance elements. It is somewhat superficial and blatantly self-contradictory in its insistence that RPGs are meant to be played while locating their artistic merit in the printed materials. The most recent and explicit argument of this type that I’m aware of, and highly instructive in its shortcomings.
Daniel McKay, The Fantasy Role-Playing Game: A New Performing Art. Discusses TTRPGs as “imaginary-entertainment environments” that draw on in-game lore as well as cultural referents to inform and inspire player performances. These performances retroactively constitute an aesthetic object (the recalled narrative) that McKay identifies as the locus of RPGS’ artistic value. A taxonomic analysis of the formal, social, cultural, and aesthetic levels that relies heavily on structuralist theory (which isn’t in itself a bad thing even if it’s no longer in vogue) with some interesting emphasis on power structures and their subversion in play.
Espen Aarseth, Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. A book primarily concerned with hypertexts and early computer and videogames. It includes a small discussion of TTRPGs as “oral cybertexts” due to their dependence on active participant engagement and decision-making. Especially valuable is Aarseth’s discussion of how criticism and theory of ergodic literature (including RPGs) must grow from the objects of study themselves rather than accepting standards, methods, and assumptions imported from other areas of critical inquiry.
Brian Duguid, “I Know What I Like!” A direct response to Laws’s “Hidden Art.” Duguid argues that players’ active engagement in games separates TTRPGs from traditional artforms, and that interpreting TTRPGs as art alienates players from their own creative labor.
Mikhail Bakhtin, Rabelais and His World. A critical inquiry into the work of the Renaissance humanist François Rabelais. Bakhtin and Rabelais both appear in other discussions of games and play. Bakhtin’s introduction discusses the culture and social dynamics of medieval Carnival, which is particularly relevant to those surrounding TTRPGs.
Roland Barthes, The Structuralist Activity. Explains structuralist thought as “fabrication of a world … to render it intelligible.” Not specifically game-related but a good (if rather abstract) complement to Duke’s discussion of games as educationally oriented abstractions of complex systems.
Places to Go, People to Be. An important early forum for TTRPG discussions. No longer in production, but its archives are still available.
Interactive Fantasy. Another early journal that explored questions regarding TTRPG design, play, and study. Also out of print, but a foundational resource for students and scholars. All four issues are available.
Analog Game Studies. A scholarly journal dedicated to tabletop games at large.
International Journal of Role-playing. An interdisciplinary journal incorporating discussions of game design, play, and study.
John H. Kim, RPG Theory. Contains links to resources discussing TTRPGs and the many issues that intersect in the gaming space.
Emily Care Boss, Thoughts. An expansive list of essays and articles on topics related to gaming.
RPG Museum, Theory. Contains entries on various theories and topics.
Do you know of a good resource that belongs in this list? Please let me know.
Emmy Allen’s Stygian Library in silhouette
Forge a dynasty from birth scream to last gasp
Insight and inspiration from Johan Nohr